Friday, January 16, 2009
Thursday, January 15, 2009
The complexity of love/Passion Paradox
Passion Paradox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Passion Paradox is a theory about romantic relationships created by Dean Delis in his book "Passion Paradox: Patterns of Love and Power in Intimate Relationship." The term "passion paradox" was coined by his co-author Cassandra Phillips. According to Delis, one partner is more in love – or emotionally invested in the relationship – than the other. The more love the loving partner wants from the other, the less the other feels like giving.
The more in love partner is in the one-down position, whilst the less in love partner occupies the one-up position. Men and women can occupy both positions at various times.
Contents
[hide]
1 The Relationship Balance
2 Details
3 Research
4 References
[edit] The Relationship Balance
"The author affirms that virtually everyone experiences love’s two sides in the same way (pleasure and pain). It does not matter whether your past experiences moulded you to be a particular person – no one, even the emotionally healthy person, is exempted from the pain of love when it tips out of balance. In this context, love relationships would produce a paradox: ‘one-downs’ try harder as they feel insecure and want to get back in control. They attempt to enhance their attraction power. The goal of such effort is to gain emotional control over the relationship as to avoid the nightmare of rejection (that means winning his or her love). But the catch is: if you prove too appealing to the one you want – to the point where the other person is clearly more in love with you – the relationship will fall out of balance.
When such event occurs, you have become the ‘one-up’ or, if you are frightened by your partner’s distance, you have become the ‘one-down’. It would seem that the very urge to attract someone, to bring another person under emotional control, contains the potential for upsetting the balance of the relationship. This is because the feeling of being in love is biochemically linked to the feeling of being out of control. Once you feel completely in control or sure of another person’s love, your feelings of passion begin to fade: vanishing the challenge or excitement of the relationship."[1]
Dr Dean C. Delis in his book "The Passion Trap: Where Is Your Relationship Going?" states
“ It's the catch-22 of romantic relationships: The more deeply one partner falls in love , the more distant the other becomes. This is the passion trap, an emotional dynamic that results in increasing desire and desperation in the 'one down' lover, and dissatisfaction, often mingled with guilt and withdrawal in the 'one up' ". ”
—Dr Dean Delis
[edit] Details
“ The very urge to attract someone, to bring another person under your emotional control, contains the potential for upsetting the balance of the relationship. And that is because the feeling of being in love is biochemically linked to the feeling of being out of control.
Once you feel completely in control or sure of another person's love, your feelings of passion begin to fade. Gone is the challenge, the emotional spark, the excitement.
Of course, we all know that the dizzy, delicious feelings of new love can't last forever. In a balanced relationship, after the initial passion fades, the partners move into a phase of enduring intimacy and warmth. But when one partner falls more deeply in love than the other, it can trigger harmful patterns between them.
Such was the case with Liz and Nate. As Liz's initial awe of him faded, she began to pursue other interests rather than center her life around him. So Nate began to feel his security in the relationship slip away. And that made him feel less in control of and more in love with Liz.
His very loving ways were attempts to win her love and to free himself from rejection anxiety . But his "hypercourtship behaviour" backfired by making Liz feel even more in control of the relationship, less excited by it, and eventually less loving toward him.
However, if your lover is more successful at winning your love than you are at winning his, as Doug was, you'll feel more insecure and more in love. Then you'll strive for closeness and control. But that will cause the one-up emotioanlly (to) back away from the relationship. And this reaction increases the one-down's insecurity and need for closeness and the one-up's security and feelings of discontent.
As Liz's predicament showed, passion trap dynamics can crop up anytime in the relationship. They may abort a new romance or hobble a long-term relationship. They may be caused by various sources of imbalance: attraction power, situational factors, gender role-playing, or personality-style incompatibilities.
”
—Dr Dean Delis
[edit] Research
"The passion paradox is one of the most familiar experiences in working with couples. One person wants more sex, more time talking, and more commitment than the other. A study of male-female relationships done at Yale University found that in 19% of relationships both partners were "equally involved" in the relationship in general.
In 36% of partnerships the woman was "less involved" and in 45% of partnerships the man was "less involved". This imbalance is partially due to a personality difference between people who enjoy connecting and people who enjoy being separate. The research shows that there are slightly more men who enjoy being more separate, but the difference is not huge. Whichever way the paradox runs, the result is often quite painful for both partners."[2]
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
~Herm Albright~
"I have three precious things which I hold fast and prize. The first is gentleness; the second is frugality; the third is humility, which keeps me from putting myself before others. Be gentle and you can be bold; be frugal and you can be liberal; avoid putting yourself before others and you can become a leader among men."
Geometrically Ordered Divinity (G.O.D.)
Passion
Somebody somewhere
In the heat of the night
Looking pretty dangerous
Running out of patience
Tonight in the city
You won't find any pity
Hearts are being twisted
Another lover cheated, cheated
In the bars and the cafes, passion
In the streets and the alleys, passion
A lot of pretending, passion
Everybody searching, passion
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Passion, passion
Passion, passion
New York, Moscow, passion
Hong Kong, Tokyo, passion
Paris and Bangkok, passion
A lotta people ain't got, passion
Hear it in the radio, passion
Read it in the papers, passion
Hear it in the churches, passion
See it in the school yards, passion
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Alone in your bed at night, passion
It's half past midnight, passion
As you turn out your sidelight, passion
Something ain't right, passion
There's no passion, there's no passion
There's no passion, I need passion
You need passion, We need passion
Can't live without passion
Won't live without passion
Even the president needs passion
Everybody I know needs some passion
Some people die and kill for passion
Nobody admits they need passion
Some people are scared of passion
Yeah passion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Passion Paradox is a theory about romantic relationships created by Dean Delis in his book "Passion Paradox: Patterns of Love and Power in Intimate Relationship." The term "passion paradox" was coined by his co-author Cassandra Phillips. According to Delis, one partner is more in love – or emotionally invested in the relationship – than the other. The more love the loving partner wants from the other, the less the other feels like giving.
The more in love partner is in the one-down position, whilst the less in love partner occupies the one-up position. Men and women can occupy both positions at various times.
Contents
[hide]
1 The Relationship Balance
2 Details
3 Research
4 References
[edit] The Relationship Balance
"The author affirms that virtually everyone experiences love’s two sides in the same way (pleasure and pain). It does not matter whether your past experiences moulded you to be a particular person – no one, even the emotionally healthy person, is exempted from the pain of love when it tips out of balance. In this context, love relationships would produce a paradox: ‘one-downs’ try harder as they feel insecure and want to get back in control. They attempt to enhance their attraction power. The goal of such effort is to gain emotional control over the relationship as to avoid the nightmare of rejection (that means winning his or her love). But the catch is: if you prove too appealing to the one you want – to the point where the other person is clearly more in love with you – the relationship will fall out of balance.
When such event occurs, you have become the ‘one-up’ or, if you are frightened by your partner’s distance, you have become the ‘one-down’. It would seem that the very urge to attract someone, to bring another person under emotional control, contains the potential for upsetting the balance of the relationship. This is because the feeling of being in love is biochemically linked to the feeling of being out of control. Once you feel completely in control or sure of another person’s love, your feelings of passion begin to fade: vanishing the challenge or excitement of the relationship."[1]
Dr Dean C. Delis in his book "The Passion Trap: Where Is Your Relationship Going?" states
“ It's the catch-22 of romantic relationships: The more deeply one partner falls in love , the more distant the other becomes. This is the passion trap, an emotional dynamic that results in increasing desire and desperation in the 'one down' lover, and dissatisfaction, often mingled with guilt and withdrawal in the 'one up' ". ”
—Dr Dean Delis
[edit] Details
“ The very urge to attract someone, to bring another person under your emotional control, contains the potential for upsetting the balance of the relationship. And that is because the feeling of being in love is biochemically linked to the feeling of being out of control.
Once you feel completely in control or sure of another person's love, your feelings of passion begin to fade. Gone is the challenge, the emotional spark, the excitement.
Of course, we all know that the dizzy, delicious feelings of new love can't last forever. In a balanced relationship, after the initial passion fades, the partners move into a phase of enduring intimacy and warmth. But when one partner falls more deeply in love than the other, it can trigger harmful patterns between them.
Such was the case with Liz and Nate. As Liz's initial awe of him faded, she began to pursue other interests rather than center her life around him. So Nate began to feel his security in the relationship slip away. And that made him feel less in control of and more in love with Liz.
His very loving ways were attempts to win her love and to free himself from rejection anxiety . But his "hypercourtship behaviour" backfired by making Liz feel even more in control of the relationship, less excited by it, and eventually less loving toward him.
However, if your lover is more successful at winning your love than you are at winning his, as Doug was, you'll feel more insecure and more in love. Then you'll strive for closeness and control. But that will cause the one-up emotioanlly (to) back away from the relationship. And this reaction increases the one-down's insecurity and need for closeness and the one-up's security and feelings of discontent.
As Liz's predicament showed, passion trap dynamics can crop up anytime in the relationship. They may abort a new romance or hobble a long-term relationship. They may be caused by various sources of imbalance: attraction power, situational factors, gender role-playing, or personality-style incompatibilities.
”
—Dr Dean Delis
[edit] Research
"The passion paradox is one of the most familiar experiences in working with couples. One person wants more sex, more time talking, and more commitment than the other. A study of male-female relationships done at Yale University found that in 19% of relationships both partners were "equally involved" in the relationship in general.
In 36% of partnerships the woman was "less involved" and in 45% of partnerships the man was "less involved". This imbalance is partially due to a personality difference between people who enjoy connecting and people who enjoy being separate. The research shows that there are slightly more men who enjoy being more separate, but the difference is not huge. Whichever way the paradox runs, the result is often quite painful for both partners."[2]
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
~Herm Albright~
"I have three precious things which I hold fast and prize. The first is gentleness; the second is frugality; the third is humility, which keeps me from putting myself before others. Be gentle and you can be bold; be frugal and you can be liberal; avoid putting yourself before others and you can become a leader among men."
Geometrically Ordered Divinity (G.O.D.)
Passion
Somebody somewhere
In the heat of the night
Looking pretty dangerous
Running out of patience
Tonight in the city
You won't find any pity
Hearts are being twisted
Another lover cheated, cheated
In the bars and the cafes, passion
In the streets and the alleys, passion
A lot of pretending, passion
Everybody searching, passion
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Passion, passion
Passion, passion
New York, Moscow, passion
Hong Kong, Tokyo, passion
Paris and Bangkok, passion
A lotta people ain't got, passion
Hear it in the radio, passion
Read it in the papers, passion
Hear it in the churches, passion
See it in the school yards, passion
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Once in love you're never out of danger
One hot night spent with a stranger
All you wanted was somebody to hold on to yeah
Alone in your bed at night, passion
It's half past midnight, passion
As you turn out your sidelight, passion
Something ain't right, passion
There's no passion, there's no passion
There's no passion, I need passion
You need passion, We need passion
Can't live without passion
Won't live without passion
Even the president needs passion
Everybody I know needs some passion
Some people die and kill for passion
Nobody admits they need passion
Some people are scared of passion
Yeah passion
An Anarchist FAQ Webpage
http://www.infoshop.org/faq/index.html
An Anarchist FAQ Webpage
Version 13.0 -- 11-NOV-2008
Introduction
Section A - What is anarchism?
Section B - Why do anarchists oppose the current system?
Section C - What are the myths of capitalist economics?
Section D - How do statism and capitalism affect society?
Section E - What do anarchists think causes ecological problems?
Section F - Is "anarcho"-capitalism a type of anarchism?
Section G - Is individualist anarchism capitalistic?
Section H - Why do anarchists oppose state socialism?
Section I - What would an anarchist society look like?
Section J - What do anarchists do?
Appendix - Anarchism and "Anarcho"-capitalism
Appendix - The Symbols of Anarchy
Appendix - Anarchism and Marxism
Appendix - The Russian Revolution
Bibliography
To contact the "An Anarchist FAQ" collective, please click here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAQ has also been translated into other languages. It is also available for download in pdf format.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click on the flag for links to other anarchist web-pages
Links last updated on 11-NOV-2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An Anarchist FAQ Webpage
Version 13.0 -- 11-NOV-2008
Introduction
Section A - What is anarchism?
Section B - Why do anarchists oppose the current system?
Section C - What are the myths of capitalist economics?
Section D - How do statism and capitalism affect society?
Section E - What do anarchists think causes ecological problems?
Section F - Is "anarcho"-capitalism a type of anarchism?
Section G - Is individualist anarchism capitalistic?
Section H - Why do anarchists oppose state socialism?
Section I - What would an anarchist society look like?
Section J - What do anarchists do?
Appendix - Anarchism and "Anarcho"-capitalism
Appendix - The Symbols of Anarchy
Appendix - Anarchism and Marxism
Appendix - The Russian Revolution
Bibliography
To contact the "An Anarchist FAQ" collective, please click here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAQ has also been translated into other languages. It is also available for download in pdf format.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click on the flag for links to other anarchist web-pages
Links last updated on 11-NOV-2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)